sábado, diciembre 21, 2024

1920-1939

TABLE OF CONTENTS – TABLE DES MATIÈRES

Page
Avant-propos – Foreword
I. Affaire des propriétés religieuses. France, Royaume-Uni, Espagne contre Portugal. La Haye, 4 septembre 1920.7-57
II. German cession of vessels and tugs for Rhine navigation. France, Germany. Paris, January 8, 1921.59-81
III. German cession of vessels and tugs for Elbe navigation. Czechoslovakia, Germany. Paris, June 14, 1921.83-95
IV. Navigation on the Danube. Allied Powers (Czechoslovakia, Greece, Romania, Serb-Croat-Slovene Kingdom); Germany, Austria, Hungary and Bulgaria. Paris, August 2, 1921.97-212
V. Affaire des réclamations françaises contre le Pérou. France contre Pérou. La Haye, 11 octobre 1920.215-221
VI. Affaire des frontières colombo-vénézuéliennes. Colombie contre Vénézuéla. Berne, 24 mars 1922.223-298
VII. Affaire de l’impôt sur les bénéfices de guerre. France contre Espagne. Genève, 15 juin 1922.301-305
VIII. Norwegian shipowners’ claims. Norway versus U.S.A. The Hague, October 13, 1922.307-346
IX. Landreau claim. USA versus Peru. London, October 26, 1922.347-367
X. Aguilar-Amory and Royal Bank of Canada claims. Great Britain versus Costa Rica. Washington, October 18, 1923.369-399
XI. Affaire relative à l’acquisition de la nationalité polonaise. Allemagne contre Pologne. Vienne, 10 juillet 1924.401-428
XII. Affaire des réparations allemandes selon l’article 260 du Traité de Versailles. Allemagne contre Commission des Réparations.Trondhjem, 3 septembre 1924.429-528
XIII. Affaire de la Dette publique ottomane. Bulgarie, Irak, Palestine, Transjordanie, Grèce, Italie et Turquie. Genève, 18 avril 1925.529-614
XIV. Affaire des biens britanniques au Maroc espagnol. Espagne contre Royaume-Uni. La Haye, 1er mai 1925.615-742
XV. German industrial charges law. Germany, Reparation Commission. Stockholm, December 28, 1925.745-752
XVI. Affaire relative à l’interprétation de l’article 11 du Protocole de Londres du 9 août 1924 (reparations allemandes). Allemagne contre Commissaire aux revenus gagés. La Haye, 23 juin 1926.755-774
XVII. The Deutsche Amerikanische Petroleum Gesellschaft oil tankers. U.S.A., Reparation Commission. Paris,August 5, 1926.777-795
XVIII. Règlement des prestations effectuées dans la Ruhr et dans les têtes de pont de Dusseldorf et de Duisburg. Allemagne contre France. La Haye, 21 septembre 1927.797-819
XIX. Affaire de l’attaque de la caravane du maharao de Cutch. Royaume-Uni contre Éthiopie. Harrar, 7 octobre 1927.821-827
XX. Island of Palmas case. Netherlands, U.S.A. The Hague, April 4, 1928.829-871
XXI. a. Interpretation of London Agreement of August 9, 1924. Germany, Reparation Commission. The Hague, March 24, 1926.
b. Idem. Award. No. II. The Hague, January 29, 1927.
c. Idem. Award. No. III. The Hague, May 29, 1928		873-899
885-890885-890
XXII. Affaire Goldenberg. Allemagne contre Roumanie. Lausanne, 27 septembre 1928.901-910
XXIII. Walter Fletcher Smith Claim. Cuba, U.S.A. Washington, D.C., May 2 1929.913-918
XXIV. Tacna-Arica question. Chile, Peru. Washington, D.C., March 4, 1925.921-958
XXV. Affaire du chemin de fer de Sopron-Köszeg. Compagnie du chemin de fer vicinal de Sopron-Köszeg contre Autriche et Hongrie. Paris, 18 juin 1929.961-973
XXVI. Affaire Martini. Italie contre Venezuela. Genève, 3 mai 1930.975-1008
XXVII. a. Responsabilité de l’Allemagne à raison des dommages causés dans les colonies portugaises du sud de l’Afrique (sentence sur le principe de la responsabilité). Portugal contre Allemagne. Lausanne, 31 juillet 1928.1011-1033
XXVII. b. Responsibilité de l’Allemagne à raison des dommages causés dans les colonies portugaises du sud de l’Afrique (sentence sur le principe de la responsabilité). Portugal contre Allemagne. Lausanne, 30 juin 1930.1035-1077
XXVIII. Shufeldt claim. Guatemala, U.S.A. Belize, British Honduras, July 24, 1930.1079-1102
XXIX. Affaire de l’île de Clipperton. Mexique contre France. Rome, 28 janvier 1931.1105-1111
XXX. Affaire Chevreau. France contre Royaume-Uni. La Haye, 9 juin 1931.1113-1143
XXXI. Affaire Campbell. Royaume-Uni contre Portugal. Bruxelles, 10 juin 1931.1145-1158
XXXII. Salem Case. Egypt, U.S.A. Berlin, June 8, 1932.1161-1237
XXXIII. The “Kronprins Gustaf Adolf”. Sweden, U.S.A. Washington, D.C., July 18, 1932.1239-1305
XXXIV. Honduras borders. Guatemala, Honduras. Washington, D.C., January 23, 1933.1307-1366
XIV. Affaire des biens britanniques au Maroc espagnol. Espagne contre Royaume-Uni. La Haye, 1er mai 1925.615-742
XV. German industrial charges law. Germany, Reparation Commission. Stockholm, December 28, 1925.745-752
XVI. Affaire relative à l’interprétation de l’article 11 du Protocole de Londres du 9 août 1924 (reparations allemandes). Allemagne contre Commissaire aux revenus gagés. La Haye, 23 juin 1926.755-774
XVII. The Deutsche Amerikanische Petroleum Gesellschaft oil tankers. U.S.A., Reparation Commission. Paris,August 5, 1926.777-795
XVIII. Règlement des prestations effectuées dans la Ruhr et dans les têtes de pont de Dusseldorf et de Duisburg. Allemagne contre France. La Haye, 21 septembre 1927.797-819
XIX. Affaire de l’attaque de la caravane du maharao de Cutch. Royaume-Uni contre Éthiopie. Harrar, 7 octobre 1927.821-827
XX. Island of Palmas case. Netherlands, U.S.A. The Hague, April 4, 1928.829-871
XXI. a. Interpretation of London Agreement of August 9, 1924. Germany, Reparation Commission. The Hague, March 24, 1926.
b. Idem. Award. No. II. The Hague, January 29, 1927.
c. Idem. Award. No. III. The Hague, May 29, 1928		873-899
885-890885-890
XXII. Affaire Goldenberg. Allemagne contre Roumanie. Lausanne, 27 septembre 1928.901-910
XXIII. Walter Fletcher Smith Claim. Cuba, U.S.A. Washington, D.C., May 2 1929.913-918
XXIV. Tacna-Arica question. Chile, Peru. Washington, D.C., March 4, 1925.921-958
XXV. Affaire du chemin de fer de Sopron-Köszeg. Compagnie du chemin de fer vicinal de Sopron-Köszeg contre Autriche et Hongrie. Paris, 18 juin 1929.961-973
XXVI. Affaire Martini. Italie contre Venezuela. Genève, 3 mai 1930.975-1008
XXVII. a. Responsabilité de l’Allemagne à raison des dommages causés dans les colonies portugaises du sud de l’Afrique (sentence sur le principe de la responsabilité). Portugal contre Allemagne. Lausanne, 31 juillet 1928.1011-1033
XXVII. b. Responsibilité de l’Allemagne à raison des dommages causés dans les colonies portugaises du sud de l’Afrique (sentence sur le principe de la responsabilité). Portugal contre Allemagne. Lausanne, 30 juin 1930.1035-1077
XXVIII. Shufeldt claim. Guatemala, U.S.A. Belize, British Honduras, July 24, 1930.1079-1102
XXIX. Affaire de l’île de Clipperton. Mexique contre France. Rome, 28 janvier 1931.1105-1111
XXX. Affaire Chevreau. France contre Royaume-Uni. La Haye, 9 juin 1931.1113-1143
XXXI. Affaire Campbell. Royaume-Uni contre Portugal. Bruxelles, 10 juin 1931.1145-1158
XXXII. Salem Case. Egypt, U.S.A. Berlin, June 8, 1932.1161-1237
XXXIII. The “Kronprins Gustaf Adolf”. Sweden, U.S.A. Washington, D.C., July 18, 1932.1239-1305
XXXIV. Honduras borders. Guatemala, Honduras. Washington, D.C., January 23, 1933.1307-1366

 

 

Arbitral Tribunal (Great Britain-United States) constituted under
the Special Agreement of August 18, 1910

Historical Note5
Bibliography7
Special Agreement:
Special Agreement for the submission to arbitration of pecuniary claims outstanding between the United States and Great Britain, concluded August 18, 19109-190
Arbitral Tribunal (Great Britain-United States) constituted under the Special Agreement of August 18, 1910 (18 June 1913 – 22 January 1926)17
Decisions:
Great Britain v U.S. (Yukon Lumber case)17-21
Owners of the Lindisfarne (Gr. Br.) v. U.S.21-24
William Hardman (Gr. Br. ) v. U.S.25- 26
The Glasgow King Shipping Company (Limited) (Gr. Br.) v. U.S. (King Robert case)27-29
Great Britain and Others (Gr. Br.) v. U.S. (Canadienne case)29-32
Henry James Bethune (Great Britain) v. United States (Lord Nelson case)32-35
Great Northwestern Telegraph Company of Canada (Great Britain). v. United States35-36
Sivewright, Bacon and Co. (Great Britain) v. United States (Eastry case)36-40
Representatives of Elizabeth Cadenhead (Great Britain) v. United States40-41
Owner of the Frederick Gerring, Jr. (United States) v. Great Britain41-42
Home Frontier and Foreign Missionary Society of the United Brethren in Christ (United States) v. Great Britain42-44
Owners of the Cargo of the Coquitlam (Great Britain) v. United States45-48
Owners of the Tattler (United States) v. Great Britain48-51
H.J.Randolph Hemming (Great Britain) v. United States51-53
Owners of the Sidra (Great Britain) v. United States53-57
Owners of the Jessie, the Thomas F. Bayard and the Pescawha (Great Britain) v. United States57-60
Owners of the Argonaut and the Colonel Jonas H. French (United States) v. Great Britain60-64
China Navigation Co., Ltd. (Great Britain) v. United States (Newchwang case)64-68
Owners, Officers and Men of the Wanderer (Gr.Br).v. United States68-77
Charterers and Crew of the Kate (Great Britain) v. United States77-82
Laughlin McLean (Great Britain) v. United States (Favourite case)82-85
Jesse Lewis (United States) v. Great Britain (David J. Adams case)85-93
George Rodney Burt (United States) v. Great Britain (Fijian Land Claims)93-99
Benson Robert Henry (United States) v. Great Britain (Fijian Land Claims)100-104
Heirs of John B. Williams (United States) v. Great Britain (Fijian Land Claims)104-109
Isaac M. Brower (United States) v. Great Britain (Fijian Land Claims)109-112
Eastern Extension, Australasia and China Telegraph Company, Ltd. (Great Britain) v. United States112-118
Cuba Submarine Telegraph Company, Ltd. (Great Britain) v. United States118-120
Robert E. Brown (United States) v. Great Britain120-131
Rio Grande Irrigation and Land Company, Ltd. (Great Britain) v. United States131-138
Union Bridge Company (United States) v. Great Britain138-142
Several Canadian Hay Importers (Great Britain) v. United States (Canadian Claims for Refund of Duties)142-147
Owner of the R. T. Roy (United States) v. Great Britain147-149
Adolph G. Studer (United States) v. Great Britain149-153
Owner of the Horace B. Parker (United States) v. Great Britain153-154
Owner of the Thomas F. Bayard (United States) v. Great Britain154-156
Owner of the Sarah B. Putnam (United States) v. Great Britain156-157
F. H. Redward and Others (Great Britain) v. United States (Hawaiian Claims)157-158
Several British Subjects (Great Britain) v. United States (Iloilo Claims)158-160
D. Earnshaw and Others (Great Britain) v. United States (Zafiro case)160-165
Luzon Sugar Refining Company, Ltd. (Great Britain) v. United States165
J. Parsons (Great Britain) v. United States165-166
Successors of William Webster (United States) v. Great Britain166-170
Cunningham and Thompson Company and Others (Great Britain) v. United States171-173
Cunningham and Thompson Company and Others (Great Britain) v. United States.171-173
Cayuga Indians (Great Britain) v. United States173-190

 

 

Tripartite Claims Commission (United States, Austria and Hungary) constituted under the Agreement of November 26, 1924 (12 April 1927- 28 June 1929)

Historical Note195
Bibliography197
Agreement:
Agreement between the United States and Austria and Hungary for the determination of the amounts to be paid by Austria and by Hungary in satisfaction of their obligations under the Treaties concluded by the United States with Austria on August 24, 1921, and with Hungary on August 29, 1921199
Decisions:
Administrative Decision No. I203-212
Administrative Decision No. II212-230
Herbert Payne (United States) v. Austria and Hungary230
Mrs. Julius Biro (United States) v. Hungary231
William Schneider and Joseph Bleier (United States) v. Hungary231-232
Kurt Heppe (United States) v. Hungary and Hungarian Commercial Bank of Pest232
Griff Glover (United States) v. Austria and Oesterreichischer-Lloyd233-234
Joseph Amschler (United States) v. Austria and Banca Commerciale Triestina234
Friederike Gottlieb (United States) v. Austria and Bohemian Savings Bank234-235
Alexander Karl Rudolph (United States) v. Austria235
Henry Neugass (United States) v. Austria and Hungary235-240
Estate of Alexander Ortlieb (United States) v. Austria and Edward Coumont, Executor of Estate of Louis Ortlieb240
Estate of Alexander Ortlieb (United States) v. Austria and Edward Coumont, Executorof Estate of Louis Ortlieb240
Karl Klein (United States) v. Austria241-242
Anton Pentz (United States) v. Austria, Hungary, and Austro-Hungarian Bank242-244
Charles R. Crane (United States) v. Austria and City of Vienna244-246
Benjamin Albert Kapp (United States) v. Hungary246-248
Alexander Tellech (United States) v. Austria and Hungary248-249
Max Fox (United States) v. Austria and Hungary249-250
Grubnau Bros., Inc., and Atlantic Mutual Insurance Company (United States) v. Austria and Hungary250-251
Rosa H. Kohn (United States) v. Hungary251-252
Indian Motocycle Company (United States) v. Austria and Hungary252-253
Henry Rothmann (United States) v. Austria and Hungary253-259
Louis Zecchetto (United States) v. Austria and Hungary259-260
Louis John Hois (United States) v. Austria and Wiener Bank-Verein260-266
The First National Bank of Boston (United States) v. Austria and Wiener Bank-Verein266-268
Mary Federer, Administratrix of the Estate of John J. Federer (United States) v. Austria and Wiener Bank-Verein268-272
George and Theresa Zohrer (United States) v. Austria and Postsparkassen-Amt in Wien272-273
Transatlantic Trust Company (United States) v. Austria and Postsparkassen-Amt in Wien274
Henry Howard Ellison, William Rodman Ellison, and Henry Howard Ellison, Jr., American Partners in the late Firm of John B. Ellison & Sons (United States) v. Austria and Leopold Kuranda274-275
Cyrus Wilfred Perkins (United States) v. Austria and Wien-Floridsdorfer Mineraloel Fabrik275-277
Hugo Dylla (United States) v. Austria; John Szanto and Szekely Varga Katalin Szanto v. Austria; Charles Gasper (United States) v. Austria277
Hugo Dylla (United States) v. Austria; John Szanto and Szekely Varga Katalin Szanto v. Austria; Charles Gasper (United States) v. Austria277
Harald Waldemar von Campen (United States) v. Austria277-278
Camilla Short (United States) v. Austria and Hungary278-279
Jacob Margulies (United States) v. Austria and Hungary279-282
Emil Frenkel (United States) v. Austria282-285
Erna McArthur (United States) v. Austria285-286
Elizabeth Filo and Bertha Salay (United States) v. Hungary286-289
John Ujvari (United States) v. Hungary289-290
Adolfo Stahl (United States) v. Hungary290-292

 

 

General Claims Commission (United States and Panama) constituted under the Claims Convention of July 28, 1926, modified by the Convention of December 17, 1932 (22 May 1933-29 June 1933)

Historical Note297
Bibliography299
Conventions:
Claims Convention between the United States of America and Panama of July 28, 1926301
Convention between the United States of America and Panama of December 17, 1932, modifying Claims Convention of July 28, 1926305
Decisions:
Agnes Ewing Brown (United States) v. Panama307-308
Walter A. Noyes (United States) v. Panama308-312
Lettie Charlotte Denham and Frank Parlin Denham (United States) v. Panama312-313
Francisco and Gregorio Castañeda and José de Leon R. (Panama) v. U.S313-314
Juan Manzo (Panama) v. U.S314-315
James Perry (United States) v. Panama315-321
Gust Adams (United States) v. Panama321-324
Charlie R. Richeson, George Klimp, James Langdon, et al., and W. A. Day (United States) v. Panama325-328
Cecelia Dexter Baldwin, Administratrix of the Estate of Harry D. Baldwin, and Others (United States) v. Panama328-333
John W. Browne (United States) v. Panama333-334
Lettie Charlotte Denham and Frank Parlin Denham (United States) v. Panama334-337
Mariposa Development Company and Others (United States) v. Panama338-341
José Maríia Vásquez Díaz, Assignee of Pablo Elías Velásquez (Panama) v. U.S341-342
Guillermo Colunje (Panama) v. U.S342-344
Juan Añorbes (Panama) v. U.S344-345
José Azael Ruiz (Panama) v. U.S345-346
Caroline Fitzgerald Shearer, Administratrix of the Estate of George Fitzgerald (United States) v. Panama346-348
Caroline Fitzgerald Shearer, Administratrix of the Estate of George Fitz­gerald (United States) v. Panama346-348
Hampden Osborne Banks, Hazel E. Hiltbold, Lewis Crandall Golder, and Richard Joseph Lee (United States) v. Panama349-352
William Gerald Chase (United States) v. Panama352-358
Marguerite de Joly de Sabla (United States) v. Panama358-370
Abraham Solomon (United States) v. Panama370-377
Panama and Abundio Caselli (Panama) v. U.S377-380
Panama and José C. Monteverde (Panama) v. U.S381-382
Compañia de Navegación Nacional (Panama) v. U.S382-386

 

 

Mixed Claims Commission (United States and Germany) (1 November 1923 – 30 October 1939)

Historical Note5
Bibliography7
Treaty of Peace between the United States and Germany, signed at Berlin, August 25, 19219
Special Agreement:
Agreement between the United States and Germany providing for the determination of the amount of the claims against Germany, signed August 10, 192213
Agreement effected by exchange of notes between the United States and Germany, providing for extension for the jurisdiction of the Mixed Claims Commission, United States and Germany, signed December 31, 192816
Decisions, Part One:
Administrative Decision No. I21-22
Administrative Decision No. II23-32
Opinion in the Lusitania Cases32-44
United States Steel Products Company (United States) v. Germany, Costa Rica Union Mining Company (United States) v. Germany, and South Porto Rico Sugar Company (United States) v. Germany (War-Risk Insurance Premium Claims)44-63
Administrative Decision No. III64-71
Eastern Steamship Lines, Inc. (United States) v. Germany (War-Risk Insurance Premium Claim)71-73
United States, Garland Steamship Corporation, and Others (United States) v. Germany73-91
Provident Mutual Life Insurance Company and Others (United States) v. Germany (Life-Insurance Claims)91-116
Administrative Decision No. IV117-119
Administrative Decision No. V119-155
Administrative Decision No. VI155-166
Maud Thompson de Gennes (United States) v. Germany166-170
Mary Barchard Williams (United States) v. Germany170-176
Edward A. Hilson (United States) v. Germany176-184
Christian Damson (United States) v. Germany184-199
Eisenbach Brothers and Company (United States) v. Germany199-203
Administrative Decision No. VII (The Vinland Case)203-252
Administrative Decision No. VIII (Claims of the Association of American Holders of Foreign Securities, Inc., and its Members)252-255
Henry W. Williamson and Others (United States) v. Germany, and Ellen Williamson Hodges, Administratrix of the Estate of Charles Francis Williamson, Deceased (United States) v. Germany256-257
Henry Groves and Joseph Groves (United States) v. Germany257-259
Hepzibah Vernon Butler (United States) v. Germany259-260
Charles H. Rosenthal, Administrator de bonis non of the Estate of Retta C. Shields, Deceased (United States) v. Germany, and Edwin H. Shields and Albert Mills, Administrators de bonis non of the Estate of Victor E. Shields, Deceased (United States) v. Ger260-262
Thomas C. Miller and Others (United States) v. Germany262-263
Gladys Bilicke (United States) v. Germany, and Gladys Bilicke, Individually and as Guardian of the Estate of Carl Archibald Bilicke, and Others (United States) v. Germany263-265
Richard J. Hickson as Administrator cum testamento annexo of Catherine J. Hickson (United States) v. Germany, and Richard J. Hickson as Administrator cum testamento annexo of Caroline Hickson Kennedy (United States) v. Germany266-269
Daniel Frohman, Individually, as Administrator of the Goods, Chattels, and Credits of Charles Frohman, Deceased, and as Administrator of the Goods, Chattels, and Credits of Caryl Frohman, Deceased, and Others (United States) v. Germany269-271
Elbert Hubbard II, Individually and as Executor of the Last Will and Testa­ment of Elbert Hubbard, and Others (United States) v. Germany, and Elbert Hubbard II, as Executor of the Last Will and Testament of Alice Hubbard, and Miriam Hubbard Roelofs272-275
Charles Ambrose Plamondon, Jr., Sole Surviving Administrator of the Estate of Charles A. Plamondon, Deceased, and Individually and on behalf of Harold Mackin Plamondon and Others (United States) v. Germany; and two other cases275-278
James F. Bishop, Administrator of the Estate of William Mounsey, Deceased, and Others (United States) v. Germany278-280
Elizabeth Ann Harrison and Others (United States) v. Germany280-283
Margaret Emerson Baker and Others, and Reginald C. Vanderbilt and Others as Executors of the Estate of Alfred G. Vanderbilt, Deceased (United States) v. Germany283-284
Caroline M. Bridge and Edgar G. Barratt, Administrators of the Estate of Justus Miles Forman, et al. (United States) v. Germany284-286
Roger B. McMullen et al. (United States) v. Germany286-288
William Mackenzie, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Mary A. Mackenzie, Deceased, and Others (United States) v. Germany288-292
Henry Cachard and H. Herman Harjes Executors of the Estate of Medora de Mores (United States) v. Germany292-294
Thomas H. Richards and Others (United States) v. Germany294-296
Alice E. and Berte Scholborg (United States) v. Germany296-297
George L. Hawley (United States) v. Germany297-298
William J. Quillin et al. (United States) v. Germany299-301
Standard Oil Company of New York (United States) v. Germany, Sun Oil Company (United States) v. Germany, and Pierce Oil Company (United States) v. Germany301-308
Winthrop C. Neilson (United States) v. Germany308-311
Arthur Sewall and Company et al. (United States) v. Germany311-318
West India Steamship Company (United States) v. Germany319-320
Housatonic Steamship Company, Inc. (United States) v. Germany320-323
Harby Steamship Company, Inc. (United States) v. Germany323-325
Universal Transportation Company (United States) v. Germany326-328
Robert E. O’Rourke, as Receiver of the Mississippi Valley, South American & Orient Steamship Company (United States) v. Germany328-330
Administrative Decision No. VII-A (Claims of American Charterers of Foreign Ships and American Owners of Ships Chartered to Aliens [Tanker cases])330-338
Union Oil Company of California ( United States) v. Germany338-340
Munson Steamship Line (United States) v. Germany340-344
Gulf Export Company (United States) v. Germany345-348
Gans Steamship Line (United States) v. Germany348-350
American Union Line, Inc. (United States) v. Germany350-353
Gans Steamship Line (United States) v. Germany353-356
The Interocean Oil Company (United States) v. Germany356-357
Jeanette Selinger (United States) v. Germany358-359
The United States Asphalt Refining Company (United States) v. Germany359-360
Barber & Co., Inc. (United States) v. Germany361-362
M.A. Quina Export Company (United States) v. Germany363-368
Arthur Ellt Hungerford (United States) v. Germany368-371
Paula Mendel and Others (United States) v. Germany372-389
Turner C. Gillenwater (United States) v. Germany389-391
Decisions:1-468
Waterman A. Taft et al. (United States ) v. Germany3-6
Robert Davie Trudgtt (United States v. Germany6-17
Harriss, Irby & Vose (United States) v. Germany17-20
Walker, Armstrong & Company (United States) v. Germany20-21
Gans Steamship Line (United States) v. Germany21-24
S. Stanwood Menken, Administrator of the Estate of Alice E. Tesson, Deceased, and Others (United States) v. Germany, and Andrew C. McGowin, Administrator of the Estate of Frank B. Tesson, Deceased, and Others (United States) v. Germany24-26
American-Hawaiian Steamship Company (United States) v. Germany26-30
Timandra Shipping Company (United States) v. Germany30-31
Samuel Rosenfield and Bertha Rosenfield (United States) v. Germany31-32
Leslie H. Crabtree (United States) v. Germany32-35
F. E. Atteaux & Co., Inc. (United States) v. Germany35-37
Universal Steamship Company (United States) v. Germany37-41
Standard Oil Company (New Jersey) (United States) v. Germany41-42
Bank of New York and Trust Company, Administrator with Will Annexed of the Estate of Fritz Achelis (Deceased) (United States) v. Germany42-43
United States of America on its Own Behalf through the Alien Property Custodian v. Germany and Kalle & Co. Aktiengesellschaft, Impleaded43-45
Rosa Vollweiler (United States) v. Germany45-52
Rudolph W. Frank (United States) v. Germany52-54
James A. Beha, Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, as Liquidator of Norske Lloyd Insurance Company, Limited, for American Policyholders (United States) v. Germany55-56
Edward Galvin, Representative and Agent of Policyholders Associa­tion (United States) v. Germany57
Knickerbocker Insurance Company of New York, Successor to Equi­table Underwriters of New York (United States) v. Germany58-59
George Achelis, Julie Achelis Spies, John Achelis, Estate of Annie Achelis Vietor, Deceased, and Estate of Fritz Achelis, Deceased, Heirs and Legatees of the Estate of Thomas Achelis, Deceased (United States) v. Germany59-63
Emil F. Helpup (United States) v. Germany and Karl Helpup, Impleaded64
William J. Quillin et al. (United States) v. Germany65-66
Alexander Sprunt & Son (United States) v. Germany66-67
Philadelphia-Girard National Bank (United States) v. Germany67-69
Philadelphia-Girard National Bank (United States) v. Germany and Direktion der Disconto Gesellschaft, Impleaded69-75
Administrative Decision No. IX75-76
Elizabeth A. Achelis, Margaret Achelis Sansome, and Frederic G. Achelis (United States) v. Germany76-80
Electric Boat Company (United States) v. Germany80-83
Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, Agency of Canadian Car and Foundry Company, Limited, and Various Underwriters (United States) v. Germany (Sabotage Cases)84-101
Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, Agency of Canadian Car and Foundry Company, Limited, and Various Underwriters (United States) v. Germany (Sabotage Cases)101-103
Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, Agency of Canadian Car and Foundry Company, Limited, and Various Underwriters (United States) v. Germany (Sabotage Cases)104-127
Katharine M. Drier (United States) v. Germany127-158
Katharine M. Drier (United States) v. Germany158-160
Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, Agency of Canadian Car and Foundry Company, Limited, and Various Underwriters (United States) v. Germany (Sabotage Cases)160-190
Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, Agency of Canadian Car and Foundry Company, Limited, and Various Underwriters (United States) v. Germany (Sabotage Cases)190-211
Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, Agency of Canadian Car and Foundry Company, Limited, and Various Underwriters (United States) v. Germany (Sabotage Cases)211-222
Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, Agency of Canadian Car and Foundry Company, Limited, and Various Underwriters (United States) v. Germany (Sabotage Cases)222-225
Lehigh Valley Railroad Company, Agency of Canadian Car and Foundry Company, Limited, and Various Underwriters (United States) v. Germany (Sabotage Cases)225-460
Agency of Canadian Car and Foundry Company, Ltd. (United States) v. Germany (Sabotage Cases)460-468
Appendices:
I. Rules of Procedure as adopted November 15, 1922, and amended from time to time, to December 31, 1932469-511
II. Order of March 25, 1925477
III. Order of May 7, 1925481
IV. (A) Minutes of Meeting of Commission,
October 31, 1933		483
(B) Excerpt from Minutes of Commission for Meeting
held May 7, 1934		491
V. Copies of correspondence in March, and June, 1939, in relation to the retirement of the German Commissioner from the Commission, as set out at pages 1703-1713 of the Minutes of the Commission for the meeting held June 15, 1939; also copies of correspondence in October, 1939, between the German Embassy and the Department of State in relation to the work of the Commission, as set out at pages 1726-1751 of the Minutes of the Commission for the meeting held October 30, 1939493

 

 

 

© Copyright Nestor Raul Vertua 2002-2024. All rights reserved.